By Pete Stapp
pstapp56@gmail.com
Competition, essential to economists from Adam Smith to
Milton Friedman, is now portrayed, through blustering media repetition, as a
radicalized Bolshevik notion since it comes to a monopolized health insurance
market by means of public option--by government—the only entity large enough to
compete with monopolization. Yet the industry begs, by policies harmful to its
customers, for competition.
Monopolized markets, privately run for-profit, can deliver
neither health care, nor news.
In the Congress, a hidebound Republican Party is
frog-walking conservative democrats away from single-payer policies which would
bring competition to the health insurance marketplace.
Yet the Transition Report on Competition Policy compiled by
the American Antitrust Institute states: that “…competition is the preferred
regulator of business behavior.” The conclusion is undeniable: competition
lowers costs. Competition causes expansion in industrial-policy variation.
Competition is the market’s invisible
hand and bailouts directed to financial cartels are
tantamount to the admission that Congress, over several administrations, failed
to maintain competitive markets.
FDR used to claim there were no accidents in politics. For
failure to properly regulate commerce, members of Congress will simply claim it
was not their intention. Yet the aggregate of coincidence points to legislative
intent, folks. Therefore, one need only look at Congress’ PAC funding to
see.
The Senate Finance Committee could move to lower health care costs by initiating repeal of
anti-competitive legislation like the McCarran-Ferguson Act which would open the
health insurance cartel to antitrust enforcement. Instead, competition is
inhibited in order to support existing monopolistic and cartel formations.
Thus the Finance
Committee’s policy-making elite snubs the practicality of enacting measures
against anti-competitive practices while openly relying upon the continued
abandonment of federal antitrust enforcement--both which further the erosion of
competition. It also ensures that the industry’s captive customer base
undergoes additional harm from systematic denial of vital medical services in
support of corporate/investor profits.
While competition is the health of our economic system, well
established corporations will naturally collude to eliminate it by simple
self-interest and is why constant vigilance by Congress is required.
It is not true that free markets self-regulate;
unrestrained, undisciplined markets are deregulated markets that hinder rivalry
and rush toward monopolization—toward anti-business and the brute-force
application of corporate economic might alone--wiping out competition and
consumer choice along a dangerous trail of fraud and deceit. Government, the necessary evil, provides the proper
restraint, discipline, regulation and enforcement which makes an economy work
for everyone, the poor, the middle-class, and the wealthy.
The Senate Finance Committee cannot act to lower health care
costs without inflicting the industry with genuine competition. And it refuses
to do so. Thus the Senate seditiously maintains a predatory health insurance
market.
The 60 member democratic majority is, in part, complicit
with the shrinking ranks of the republicans in forging a “no-changes” health
care bill unpalatable to the public. Many in the Senate simply care mostly
about the relationships they’ve forged with large corporations. Their word,
commitment and pride, are vested in those who pay to get them elected and
re-elected.
Congress’ historical failure to maintain market competition
has left us to deal with the wretched truth of their policies—that the exertion
of extraordinary corporate influence on congress is the most fundamentally
obvious example of conflict of interest anywhere.
Powerful corporate lobbying practices subordinate the most fundamental act of citizenship to artificial business mechanisms that can never be citizens. This is what happens when congress
understands the natural human weakness to accept bribery then sanctifies it
with legality.
Such weakness is amplified in current members of Congress, who, as knowing adults willfully place Americans under the heel of a new kind of
anti-competitive power—one completely alienating to our Constitution, our
Republic and its Democracy.
Portions of Pete Stapp's article on competition were published in the Opinion section of the Greeley Tribune on August 27, 2009.
Maybe this is me talking nonsense, but it seems like Google isn't a company run strictly by the top and they seem to be doing quite well.
Posted by: JamesDX | 02/11/2010 at 07:52 AM
I think that you need to start somewhere with healthcare.I agree with most of is being proposed and disagree with being put into a high risk pool. I like having a choice in what coverage I choose.
Posted by: health insurance | 02/02/2011 at 02:37 AM
Currently, health insurance is dominated by a private for profit corporate cartel denying competition via the high costs of entry to the industry. This action monopolizes the health insurance market ensuring thru anti-competition, that you have no genuine choice between competitors (because there are no competitors) to lower the overall costs and provide choice. The choices you believe you have are just the narrow range of differences offered that do not lower costs while the private monopolized market continues its control over price and supply.
Government is a public monopoly albeit one that we have a say in. Even competition by another monopoly--public monopoly v. private monopoly, would de-monopolize the health insurance market and immediately drive down costs of private health insurance corporations who fear losing business to genuine competition. In a gov't single payer system, high risk individuals would be given priority as they should since their need for care is immediate. This is exactly the opposite in most cases with private health insurance as it seeks healthy clients which statistically assure its maximization of profits while it statistically denies payment for serious conditions as people age and or are injured.
Posted by: Pete Stapp | 02/03/2011 at 11:06 AM
The choices you believe you have are just the narrow range of differences offered that do not lower costs while the private monopolized market continues its control over price and supply.
Posted by: pandora | 03/25/2011 at 12:28 AM
You are able to definitely produce a fantastic very first impression on everybody any time you are entering a area, for those who have on some truly gorgeous pieces of jewelry. You should spend near interest to those valuable strategies and rely on them, to ensure that you can explore the easiest way to pick jewelry.
When operating with harsh chemicals like cleaning items, carrying out laundry, or using a bath you should constantly clear away your jewelry. To wash your jewellery it is best to use heat drinking water using a gentle soap, rinse it off, then polish your jewelry that has a jewellery polish and dry ahead of placing it back again into storage.
With regards to showing off your individuality via jewellery, most of the time you may make a more substantial statement with a lot less. Pick out daring, extraordinary pieces, but restrict your self to wearing one or two at a time. A refined pair of chandelier earrings can set off an outfit on it is really Cheap UGG Boots
personal, and from time to time a flashy cocktail ring will be the only glitz you may need to draw consideration.
You should not wear your jewelry should you approach on heading for the swim or in the event you approach on likely in some other body of water that will incorporate harsh chemicals. These kinds of factors may cause your jewelry to age substantially far more quickly. Safeguard your jewellery and be conscientious.
When you have ugg boots
wonderful jewelry or heirloom jewellery whose value you should shield as a result of insurance policy, it can be a good idea to consider superb pics of those items and also to have an appraisal completed by a professional. Make certain that the images you are taking are very good, high quality types. Employing a flash when using these footage will not likely cause fantastic pics of your respective jewelry. It is best to capture a picture of your valuable jewelry beneath delicate, diffused fluorescent bulbs.
To create the perfect number of flair to any outfit just add a single assertion bit of jewelry. No matter whether it be a big ring, some bold earrings, a thick bracelet, or perhaps a chunky necklace, adding a statement piece to any outfit will not only deliver it from the regular but may even ensure it is extra 'you'. On top of that, a press release piece is certain to produce an awesome conversation starter in any occasion.
Posted by: Keratausshuri | 12/13/2011 at 02:15 AM